Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 4,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2007, 5:24 am
Cir. 1997); Willner v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 9:30 am
People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:36 am
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently announced that it would sue to block Amgen’s proposed $27.8 billion acquisition of Horizon Therapeutics. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:01 am
Schneider v. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 4:55 pm
The court cited Gichuru v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:40 pm
“While the administrative record is not so bare as to frustrate judicial review as to all of the plaintiffs’ claims, it is entirely bare as to how the EPA has applied the Final Guidance. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm
At most, a bare majority of the Court would probably adopt Chief Justice Rehnquist's concurrence from Bush v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:41 am
At a bare minimum. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:47 pm
Loracs can barely contain himself as he reads the first paragraph of the Ninth Circuit's opinion, which says: "An old fable tells tale of a Pope, who, convinced of his own grave sin, called on his cardinals to judge him. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm
Even unsophisticated users who barely made it through junior high school know what a "gram" of methampetamine entails. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
_____________________* The Court also cites federal law to the same effect -- Broadcort Capital Corp. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 10:30 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 4:30 am
" Harris v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
The Barings scandal is a clear example. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 5:35 am
Terry v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 2:01 pm
According to a bare majority, whether the supervisor’s conduct actually violated state law was not dispositive, because the WPA protects employees who report actual and suspected violations of the law. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:43 pm
I'm not sure where I stand on qualified immunity—I haven't looked at its history closely enough—but I thought this was well put, in Judge Willett's dissent yesterday in Villarreal v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm
In fact, the future was barely considered at all, so that Birmingham's case really fell at the first hurdle - after all, that is precisely what Baroness Hale was requiring local authorities to do in Moran (and, it might be added, significantly lowering the threshold for a finding of homelessness). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:19 am
In a January 31, 2011 Memorandum Opinion, in the case of Eley v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:56 am
Block’s opinion is nothing more than bare legal conclusions. [read post]
