Search for: "Blakely v. Blakely"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:11 pm
“ In Brown v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:58 am
Similarly, asome fabric designs can be given copyright protection as works of art and as prints (see Peter Pan Fabrics v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
In Department of Commerce v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 3:22 am
Murphy followed Friedman (and its forebears including Blake) to the same effect. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
Para 159, to the extent it notes that restitution is “frequently based upon the theory of unjust enrichment”, is undoubtedly correct, but it may not be accurate to suggest that there “can be no restitution without unjust enrichment”, for the law does recognise restitution for wrongs (Attorney General v Blake). [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
” IPSO 20214-23 Lunn v The Jewish Chronicle, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach: sanction – publication of correction 20293-23 Mendes v Western Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20606-23 White v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies in the last week. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
On the same day there was a consequentials hearing in the case of LCG v OVD, QB-2022-000921. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
On Wednesday 1 November 2023 there will be a CMC in the case of Daedone -v- BBC. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 3:57 am
Dawes, (we filed an amicus brief), and United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:51 am
As the Supreme Court stated in footnote 35 of Stone v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Blake Brown Canadian State Trials, Vol. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
Blake BrownCanadian State Trials, Vol. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
: Patent bar, doctors face off in Prometheus v Mayo (The Prior Art) US Copyright Rights owners taking on small victims – Warner Music vs ‘Keyboard Cat’ YouTube clip; DC Comics vs John Stacks over figurines; Frank Gaylord vs postal service over art image on stamps (1709 Copyright Blog) US Copyright – Decisions District Court Colorado: Republishing third party rankings in marketing material might be copyright/trade mark… [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:05 pm
Compare MJ v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
For The Washington Post, Aaron Blake lists the pros and cons of six shortlisters. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 10:06 am
By Colleen V. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
Similarly, the Courts have made clear that they will not “regulate issues as to the procedures adopted by religious bodies or the customs and practices of a particular religious community or questions as to the moral and religious fitness of a person to carry out the spiritual and pastoral duties of his office” (Blake v Associated Newspapers [2003] EWHC 1960 (QB)) Unable to decide the case Ultimately Mr Justice Eady found that he was simply unable to decide the case. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:51 am
Arizona) and to sentencing schemes limiting years of incarceration a judge may impose in the absence of specific factual findings (Blakely v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Rev. 56, 63–66 (2015) (suggesting after King v. [read post]
