Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 1161 - 1180 of 7,433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2018, 3:28 pm by Michael Froomkin
She does all the work, it’s his song with her ‘guest’ vocal? [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:48 am
An ordinal function tells us that individual i prefers possible world X to possible world Y, but it doesn't tell us whether X is much better than Y or only a little better. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 11:34 am by Betsy McKenzie
* Look at the activities the website highlights – be sure you understand what the organization does! [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:37 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  In response to "X said something negative about Trump," Trump's avatar says: "X sucks! [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:01 am
Luckily, using Parallels, Mac users can run Windows within Mac OS X, so switching to a Mac does not mean you'll have to give up your favorite Windows programs. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 9:40 am by emagraken
While the BC Supreme Court does have the ability to compel a Plaintiff to attend a defence medical exam a proper evidentiary foundation must be established before the Court will be prepared to exercise this power. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:22 am
Does this mean if you are in IT you can relax? [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
Supreme Court hosts London launch of ChIPs with call to action to advance women in tech, law and policy I Br*x*t and brands – out of the EU in 680 days I In memoriam: Adolph Kiefer, Olympic gold medalist, innovator and inventor extraordinaire I Digital copies, exhaustion, and blockchains: lack of legal clarity to be offset by technological advancement and evolving consumption patterns? [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
Please make sure that when you read this that you don't post it for all to see, I'm a attorney in North Texas and it would cause me and my office manager X all sorts of grief if seen and reported. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm by stevemehta
Pioneer Medical Group,  held that “the Act does not apply unless the defendant health care provider had a substantial caretaking or custodial relationship, involving ongoing responsibility for one or more basic needs, with the elder patient. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 3:52 pm
The Bill transposes the directive (and does lots of other fun stuff too). [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:38 am
Here is the calculation for our example in numeric form: First, I convert the fractions to decimals so they are easier to multiply: 20/40 = 0.5 40/320 = 0.12500 1/6 = 0.166666 1/2 = 0.5 Next, I multiply out the calculation: 0.5 X 0.12500 X 0.166666 X .5 = 0.005206 The result of this calculation is that for every dollar of gas sold from the well, you and your sister in our example would each get 0.005206 of that… [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
  The per curiam decision does not reveal whether the American Medical Association ethical and practice guidelines, discussed more fully below, were raised in support of the plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm by Stan
I don’t think the “We haven’t had rain like this in X number of years” defense against foreseeability holds up. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 4:58 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"WikiLeak Ethics" http://j.mp/cTI2hZ why does hollywood think i'm a loser? [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 11:05 am by South Florida Lawyers
Seventy-three paragraphs precede Count I.....Uh oh.Count I incorporates paragraphs one through seventy-three, and each of the nine succeeding counts incorporates all preceding counts, such that Count X amounts to an amalgamation of all counts of the complaint.This is not good. [read post]