Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 8,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am
Under Section 1 of the settlement agreement, the settlement stipulation shall become effective upon the approval of Almod board of directors and shall be binding on Albert regardless of whether he executes it or not, so long as Donna and Morris both execute the agreement (NYSCEF # 21- settlement agreement,§§ 1.a, 1.b).2 In fact, Donna and Morris executed the agreement and the board of directors approved it. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
Oct. 20, 2015): Tomaydo does not point to anything demonstrating that the recipe book is an original compilation. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am
First, ¶ 6.1 of the Agreement1 provides that GYPC, as seller, and the Third‐Party Defendants, 1 Paragraph 6.1 of the Agreement states: Indemnification by the Seller and Principals. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 5:30 am
The issue comes up, "who does the attorney work for, the insured or the insurer? [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 8:04 am
Slip op. at 20. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 3:34 am
Each attorney represented anywhere from one to 14 sex offenders known publicly as John Does 1 through 30, and four more lawyers represented the defendants -- state, county and municipal officials.The John Does have sued the state, district attorneys, sheriffs and police chiefs, seeking to remain relatively anonymous. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The Jan. 6 Panel Wants to Talk to Ivanka Trump National Public Radio – Caitlyn Kim | Published: 1/20/2022 The House select committee looking into the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol is seeking Ivanka Trump’s voluntary cooperation with its investigation. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
What does this mean? [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 2:09 am
Seldom does the citizen accused ever get through the Roviaro veil to get disclosure of the CI. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:50 pm
And Justice Rushing does a great job explaining why this condition is overbroad. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:42 am
Johnson does not lack for stubbornness. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 3:31 am
Certified Question No. 1: "Does New York common law permit the owner of a famous mark or trade dress to assert property rights therein by virtue of the owner's prior use of the mark or dress in a foreign country? [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:27 pm
Based on the felony complaint, the Grand Jury testimony, the victim's statement and the Pre-sentence Report, they all establish by clear and convincing evidence that defendant used forcible compulsion (10 points), had sexual intercourse with the victim and acted in concert with co-defendant JS in having deviate sexual intercourse with her (25 points), and that the defendant and victim were strangers (20 points). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:56 am
Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate a meritorious cause of action for legal malpractice (Tortorello v Carlin, 286 AD2d 628 [2001]), there being insufficient evidence that “but for” defendants’ alleged negligence in not filing a motion for summary judgment or going to trial in lieu of settling the underlying action, plaintiff would have achieved a more favorable result (Wexler v Shea & Gould, 1 1 AD2d 450 . [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 4:30 am
The FMLA does not require an employer to adjust its performance standards for when an employee is on the job. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
A judgment of divorce was entered on March 13, 2018, which incorporated the decision dated December 20, 2017. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 11:34 am
White 20-240Issue: Whether a capital defendant can waive a claim of intellectual disability under Atkins v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm
No justice - including Clarence Thomas, who has explicitly defended Loving - has any desire to do that. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 9:58 am
However, this does mean that plaintiff did have valid claims against third parties such as the manufacturers of the deadly products named as the other 13 defendants in this mesothelioma lawsuit. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:30 am
Where such damages can be recovered, it does not matter that the employer is unable to show that it has suffered loss. [read post]
