Search for: "Does 1 - 35" Results 1161 - 1180 of 9,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2011, 4:27 am by Darrin Mish
But if you have made a property transfer, it does not mean you are taxable. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The district court granted appellees’ motionsto dismiss for failure to state a claim and entered finaljudgment that claims 1–25 and 33–36 of the ’179 patentare ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
To ensure this Convention remains focused on investigations of cybercrimes and does not become a vehicle for investigating any and all offenses, Article 35 should be limited to global cooperation on offenses set out in Articles 6-16. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:30 pm
Accordingly, we hold that the trial court erred in imposing a lesser sentence on defendant than the one negotiated between him and the prosecutor pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:35-12. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:21 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent No. 6,781,231 (the ‘231 patent), but that claim 1 is invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 3:06 pm by Steven Jensen
  The answer is this:  when you have high levels of PCBs in your body, you are at increased risk for developing NHL, but that does not necessarily mean that you will ever develop that cancer (or any other). [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Guido Paola
The BoA does not admit said request into the appeal proceedings. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am by Jessica Kroeze
Furthermore, if a certain fraction derived from a prior art polymer has properties that fall within the scope of the claims, does this polymer then make the composition as claimed available to the public? [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 9:43 pm by R. J. Quianzon
But even if it does, you should note that a lower starting price does not prevent the permit’s eventual price from skyrocketing. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 1:50 pm by Tony Lee
The construction deadline in question stems from Section 27.14(g), which requires 700 MHz B Block folks both to provide signal coverage and to offer service over at least 35% of the geographic area of their licenses by one  of two dates, either (1) June 13, 2013 (if the initial authorization was granted on June 13, 2009 or earlier), or (2) within four years of the initial license grant. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:11 am
In an appeal of a 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:08 am
The disagreement related to whether exception 2 does indeed authorize such pro-abortion speech. [read post]