Search for: "Downs v. State of California"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 6,448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2015, 1:28 pm
He called Oracle v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 10:41 am
” Peviani v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 8:29 pm
Since the Supreme Court issued Graham v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:15 pm
Moreno v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
We were thinking about this truth when we read the recent case of Seedman v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:38 am
” The state high court also had occasion to look at Fourth Amendment California search and seizure law recently. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
United States of America et al., a case heard in the United States District Court Central District of California by Judge Virginia A. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
Backers of California’s Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage in that state on Monday questioned whether a federal judge lacked the authority even to rule in the federal constitutional case, so his ruling striking down the ban must be wiped out. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 11:29 am
Dept. of Corrections in 2004, and, more recently this past October, Jordan v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:51 am
Doe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 2:43 pm
United States District Court Judge Claudia Wilken (Northern District of California) granted a motion for class certification in a suit alleging failure to comply with California's meal period requirements and pay an additional hour of pay for each instance of a violation. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
In the recent case of People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:09 pm
One case highlighted is Gbarabe v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am
Again, on May 27, 2009, the same day that the federal challenge to California’s Proposition 8 in Perry v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:38 am
The case is Silvester v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:45 am
Sheehan v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 1:41 pm
The primary issue before us is whether, in light of Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]), this sentencing scheme violates Apprendi and defendant's due process and Sixth Amendment rights. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has denied plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider its September 16 2010, ruling that plaintiffs in the ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation have no standing to pursue their price fixing claims against an ATM network and a group of banks. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 2:16 am
Second, it is reported that on 31 August 2010, the California Assembly passed Assembly Bill 2479 to crack down on paparazzi photographers who harass celebrities. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
Application to California Employers While the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Cadena v. [read post]
