Search for: "Ex Parte Cross"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
Elstad by holding that the deliberate, planned refusal to warn, followed by warnings after confession should be treated the same as the momentary, innocent failure to warn in Elstad; and 3) the Ohio Supreme Court’s ruling that defendant’s confession was voluntary resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of facts presented in the state court proceeding, because the “admonition” that defendant should “cut a deal” was not simply… [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:36 pm
This is an overstatement of the ex- pert’s declaration. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
This is the case of the comedian who is being sued by her ex-husband over statements made in her show. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Kennedy and ex-wife of New York Gov. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
It wasn’t part of my dream, they really did. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
It wasn’t part of my dream, they really did. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:43 am
In support of this recommendation, the testimony noted that patent prosecution is ex parte even though third parties in the same field may have relevant information and expertise to the evaluation of a patent application and that patent litigation in federal court is extremely costly and lengthy and is not an option unless the patent owner has threatened the potential challenger with patent infringement litigation. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Lapsley’s and FSIS’s efforts to take and verify an inventory and have been providing unimpeded access to the inventory, facilities, and related records; Defendants complied with provisions in the Second Contempt Sanctions Order requiring them, as part of the inventory process: (a) to separate and identify meat and poultry articles intended for Amos Miller’s or his family’s personal use; (b) appropriately and clearly to identify (by species and product type) articles… [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
Effectively, it aims to eliminate obstacles to trade (C-491/01 Ex p. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
The mining magnate has filed documents in the NSW Supreme Court claiming both episodes of the two-part series defamed her. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Ex Parte Wood & Brundage, 22 U.S. 603 (1824) McCormick Harvesting Mach. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
La Crosse Health & Rehab, 138 Idaho 859, 864, 71 P.3d 458 (2003) had been wrong. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 10:26 am
Evid. 901(a), 902(10).The Gillespies also objected to the admissibility of portions of the attached, authenticated records: (1) the pool supplement, which supplemented the May 1, 2002 note-purchase agreement between First Marblehead and Bank One; (2) a single page following the pool supplement (the orphan page), which the Trust asserted was included as part of the pool supplement's schedule 1 and showed that the Gillespies' note was included in those pooled for sale; (3) the DAS,… [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
The implications of the issues in this case go far beyond the statute of frauds governing contingent fee contracts and the reasonableness of an hourly fee of $85,000.00, whether imputed or part of an express loadstar calculation.III. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
When Vermont sought to require the Plan’s third-party administrator, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
The defendant declined to take part in any of the proceedings. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Evid. 901(a), 902(10).The Gillespies also objected to the admissibility of portions of the attached, authenticated records: (1) the pool supplement, which supplemented the May 1, 2002 note-purchase agreement between First Marblehead and Bank One; (2) a single page following the pool supplement (the orphan page), which the Trust asserted was included as part of the pool supplement's schedule 1 and showed that the Gillespies' note was included in those pooled for sale; (3) the DAS,… [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 5:51 am
It took more than 70 days before an Israeli crossing into Gaza was opened. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:23 am
Defendant was cross-examined about not giving a statement, and defense counsel again failed to timely object. [read post]
