Search for: "GARCIA V. GARCIA" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2011, 6:54 am by Howard Friedman
Wrenn, (1st Cir., July 14, 2011), the 1st Circuit affirmed the dismissal of claims by an Orthodox Jewish former prisoner that his rights were violated by requiring him to have a beard no more 1/4 inch in length.In Garcia v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 5:01 am by José Guillermo
El ajedrez, a diferencia de cualquier otro deporte, juego o ciencia transformada en juego, se diferencia de los meramente visuales y efectistas, el Inolvidable Víctor Korchnoi a los 80 años de edad tenía más 2500 puntos de Elo, si analizamos "jugadores magníficos" debo precisar que no alcanzamos la decena de Grandes Maestros y el número once más fuerte, reconocido por la FIDE, es un jovencito de Tarapoto (ciudad de la selva peruana)… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm by JB
Usery, which was specifically overturned in 1985 in Garcia v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 am
Further, said the court, "there is no requirement that [Garnes] be notified of the extension of the probationary period, citing Garcia v Bratton, 90 NY2d 991. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:51 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"The Appellate Division unanimously reversed, holding that "the Board's decision, which was entitled to 'substantial deference,' had a rational basis" but granted the City leave to appeal on a certified question of whether its order was properly made.The Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division's ruling, Judge Garcia dissenting, explaining:1. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 11:12 pm
Héctor Valverde Santana, Proteção internacional do consumidor: necessidade de harmonização da legislação Cleise Martins Costa, A construção de padrões internacionais por agentes privados e a modificação de legislação nacional: alteração do padrão de contabilidade para empresários no Brasil Carina Costa de Oliveira, The Debate over Companies’ Liability for… [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 8:00 pm
Both the Appellate Term and the Appellate Division affirmed, but the Court of Appeals ultimately reversed.Judge Michael Garcia, who wrote the majority opinion for the Court of Appeals, noted that because a purchase of rights had removed the unit from rent regulation under the Loft Law, the unit could not be subject to rent stabilization or afforded eviction protections. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 2:34 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Texas, Austin Division, 2020) Filed 04/30/2020[Mexico] [Petition granted] District Court stayed return due to Covid19] Grave risk of harm not established] [Violation of fundamental principles not established]Garcia, v Reynosa,  2020 WL 777247 (U.S. [read post]