Search for: "German v. State"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 3,581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 10:47 pm
Google, or who debated the Blizzard v. bnetd DMCA case with me back in the day. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 1:40 pm
An ACS v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:11 am
Some more German Qualcomm v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:44 am
The European Commission has so far not reciprocated with a similar regime and has instead continued to push for UK firms to submit an application for authorisation in the relevant Member State where they wish to conduct business. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:12 pm
‘The Supreme Court decision in eBay v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
QE is representing Qualcomm against Apple in a series of German infringement cases, and Freshfields is defending Apple. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:03 am
The roundtable discussion was on the recent decisions of Nigeria’s Supreme Court (SC) in Adeokin v MCSN and Compact Disc v MCSN on the locus standi (right of action) of collective management organisations (CMOs) under the Nigerian Copyright Act. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:25 am
Qualcomm opinion, and even though the Supreme Court held the Apple v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:46 am
What Qualcomm wanted was to gain leverage over Apple well in advance of the Apple & contract manufacturers v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In 2003, in Grutter v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:26 am
There is every indication that the San Diego Apple et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
At the recent FTC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 11:12 am
"The case reference is HTC Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 2:58 am
‘This doesn’t pass the straight-face test.'” [Short Circuit on Sali v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:07 am
On the contrary, the Germans started employing new weapons of indiscriminate killing—V-1 and V-2 rockets. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:00 am
The most recent issue of the Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft (German Journal of Comparative Law; Vol. 117 [2018], No. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
In the United States, SK hynix is represented by Sidley Austin against Netlist. [read post]