Search for: "In Interest of Ac" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,349
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2013, 8:30 am by Cheng-Yi Liu
 The FCC, somewhat confusingly, distinguishes between software which allows one to “engage” in ACS and software which merely “manages” ACS. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:20 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Nor is it necessary that Honeywell have directly ac- cused Arkema of potential indirect infringement. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
The failure, submits Mr Marshall Williams [for MS I], is fatal to the review decision regardless of the likelihood of a relevant or effective response from the applicant.The Council argued thatunless the deficiency amounts to “something lacking of sufficient importance to the fairness of the procedure to justify an extra-procedural safeguard”, it is not covered by the regulation 8(2) process, and that whether it is in this class is for the reviewer alone to judge, subject only to… [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
The failure, submits Mr Marshall Williams [for MS I], is fatal to the review decision regardless of the likelihood of a relevant or effective response from the applicant.The Council argued thatunless the deficiency amounts to “something lacking of sufficient importance to the fairness of the procedure to justify an extra-procedural safeguard”, it is not covered by the regulation 8(2) process, and that whether it is in this class is for the reviewer alone to judge, subject only to… [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:21 pm by Florian Mueller
Judge Koh found that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the jury's findings.In connection with Apple's multitouch software patents, which were found valid and infringed (and which findings Judge Koh decided to uphold), the most interesting issue is that there was indeed an inconsistency in the jury verdict because the '915 patent was found infringed by multiple Samsung devices running Android 2.2.1 or 2.2.2, but not by the Galaxy Ace (Android 2.2.1), Intercept… [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:50 am by INFORRM
Unlike, say, Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] AC 457, [2004] UKHL 22 (6 May 2004), this is not a case of Cowen on intensely private and personal time, seeking private help for very personal demons. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm by NL
Monk [1992] AC 478) to reach the higher Courts. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm by NL
Monk [1992] AC 478) to reach the higher Courts. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm by Howard Knopf
Will AC actual make good on its threats of litigation, and if so, will AC finally achieve success against anyone other than “Mom and Pop” copy shops? [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 7:17 pm by Afro Leo
Kenyan AC laws have had to endure scrutiny from the their Courts because they were perceived to restrict access to legitimate drugs. [read post]
11 Dec 2012, 10:12 am by Yukiko Kojima
A well-attended session discussed recently closed US P3 projects:  California’s Presidio Parkway Project (awarded to a Hochtief consortium in 2011); Florida’s I-595 Project (awarded to an ACS consortium in 2009); and Denver’s Eagle Project (awarded to a Fluor consortium in 2010). [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:47 pm by Florian Mueller
But since Apple won so much last time, it stands more to lose at this stage.Apple's strategy is interesting but I'm not sure that it will be able to convince the court that a terminal disclaimer affecting the expiration date of the D'677 patent further down the road (at a time when it probably won't even be commercially relevant anymore) really cures the problem with a view to Samsung, considering that approximately 50% of the jury's total damages award relates to… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
As all the fine Private International Law practitioners reading this post will know, forum non conveniens requires the Court’s consideration of the test set out by Lord Goff of Chieveley in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 6:49 pm by Rumpole
 Interesting side note: apparently a Miami Herald reader posted a comment on line,  in Ovalle's coverage of the trial, noting that Weintraub was suspended. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 11:25 am by NL
It is about time that their operation received some scrutiny as providers of accommodation.And, yes,  there is an obvious reason for my interest in this topic. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 11:25 am by NL
It is about time that their operation received some scrutiny as providers of accommodation.And, yes,  there is an obvious reason for my interest in this topic. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:12 am by Mandelman
  I’d answer the question correctly when called on in class and always ace the exams, but only because I soon came to understand what they were looking for as far as an “answer” to such questions was concerned. [read post]