Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 1161 - 1180 of 30,621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2017, 1:22 am by Sme
")   *Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:04 am by Diana L. Skaggs
FC does not have the authority to re-characterize a “petition” for a DVO as a motion for an extension of a DVO. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:09 pm by Josh Blackman
Some years ago, I remarked that "[w]e're all textualists now. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
On 4 December 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) handed down judgment in the case of Roman Zakharov v Russia ([2015] ECHR 1065). [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am by Betsy McKenzie
However, in coming to this ruling, Judge Leon distinguishes the 1979 decision, Smith v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:43 pm
 Now, if you'd have let the thing collapse, yeah, you're covered.But you're an idiot. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 12:32 pm
  Regardless, she does an admirable job advocating for her conclusion. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 9:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Diehr, 450 U.S. at 189–90 (quoting In re Bergy, 596 F.2d 952, 961 (C.C.P.A. 1979), vacated as moot, Diamond v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
This case involves attempt to re-enter the U.S. case. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 1:20 pm
  At the same time. does the OC Superior Court really only have one or two attorneys who are jerks in MSCs? [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 10:28 am
 They're not.But once you've got an answer, there you go. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:26 pm
Blume asserted that Ashe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
Even though, in the short term, it sure does save some time, eh? [read post]