Search for: "In re A. V." Results 1161 - 1180 of 62,903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2016, 12:39 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Kelly: belmont-v-kelly-etc-brief-re-state-of-nooksack-tribal-judiciary-and-emergency-motion-for-misc-relief And here is an order from the Nooksack Supreme Court (holdover council) in In re Orders Entered by Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals: in-re-orders-entered-by-nooksack-tribal-court-of-appeals-mandate-and-order-vacating-tribal-court-of-appeals-orders-as-void   [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:52 am
Supreme Court said Thursday that its internal investigation into last year's unprecedented leak of the draft abortion ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
Integra was not inconsistent with the Supreme Court decision, Justice Scalia generated a mechanism to re-introduce 'solely'"). [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 9:20 am
By now, you should all know that I’m not a fan of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:44 am by Ted Folkman
’” The court distinguished Contec Corp. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As Plaintiff's breach of contract claims  "... were litigated, or could have been litigated in his Education Law §3020-a hearing or his proceeding to vacate the arbitration award," the Appellate Division ruled that the claims were barred by the doctrine of res judicata. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As Plaintiff's breach of contract claims  "... were litigated, or could have been litigated in his Education Law §3020-a hearing or his proceeding to vacate the arbitration award," the Appellate Division ruled that the claims were barred by the doctrine of res judicata. [read post]