Search for: "King v. United States Government" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, we see judges engaged in principled deliberation under a governing ethos of rational consistency with precedents, and working-pure the principles underlying those precedents, in a way that would have made Dworkin proud -- if he had read them. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:15 am
City of Oklahoma, 816 F.2d 539, 540-41 (10th Cir. 1987), alleging a right of privacy under the Florida state constitution and the United States Constitution; Brashear v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
The first is from the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, Miner v Kings (County), 2017 NSCA 5. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
Hodges, same-sex couples could marry in 37 states; now that right reaches across the entire United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am by Rory Little
United States (1998, in which Justice Breyer wrote for the majority) that first advanced the constitutional theory adopted by the Court in Apprendi v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:46 am by Andrew Koppelman
That ideal was attractive and even necessary precisely because, since the founding of the United States, the country’s religious composition had changed, with large numbers of Catholic and Jewish immigrants. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:41 am by Matt Bodie
Nixon, United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
United States The Guardian reports on a hearing of a motion by President Trump to dismiss a libel action by former Apprentice contestant, Summer Zervos. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
United States Melania Trump has attended a hearing in her libel case against a Maryland blogger apparently to show how serious she is about the case. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm by Riann Winget
A federal judge in California blocked a Biden Administration rule that bars migrants who crossed into the United States from applying for asylum unless they entered the country at an official port of entry or obtained asylum protection in a different country. [read post]