Search for: "Los Angeles v. Superior Court"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– Staff, Taunton Daily Gazette, April 30, 2010 The owner of Northeast Demolition and Removal, and a site foreman who worked for the same company, have pled guilty in New Bedford Superior Court to charges they violated the Massachusetts Clean Air Act by failing to improperly remove asbestos from properties in Attleboro and North Attleborough. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 1:17 pm
These plans required no zoning variances and did not affect the City of Los Angeles’s (“L.A. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
Rico of the Los Angeles County Superior Court also ordered certain Watson executives to testify under oath about the company's pain patches. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
23 May 2014, 1:39 pm
Novartis AG, California Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty., Transcript of Oral Argument on Post-Trial Motions, at 46 -47 (March 18, 2004) (Hon. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
This so-called "Glomar response" is derived from a Cold War-era case, when the CIA refused to confirm or deny to the Los Angeles Times whether it had information about the USNS Hughes Glomar Explorer, a CIA ship that was used to try to salvage a sunken Soviet spy sub. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
The Court of Appeal will have original jurisdiction over these claims. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Litigation Blog) New Jersey local patent rules (IP Frontline) US Patents – Decisions CAFC applies KSR – finding combination claims obvious: Ball Aerosol v Limited Brands, Bath & Body Works etc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) CAFC rejects lower court’s ob [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:14 pm
… On February 13, 2018, Doe filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the Regents in Los Angeles Superior Court, in which he challenged the disciplinary proceedings and decision rendered by the University. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
I’m assuming he meant the FDIC, but what do I know, that’s what the court documents said, the FTC. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Gelblum, Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Los Angeles, California; Carey R. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
BC347671) APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Federal court papers on a settlement between the government and the Indiana-based company say that Cummins shipped heavy duty diesel engines to vehicle equipment manufacturers between 1998 and 2006 without including pollution control equipment. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:24 pm
Superior Court of Los Angeles, which adopted a new “ABC test” to determine whether a worker is properly classified as an independent contractor. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:13 am
ALM: LegalTech West Coast June 23-24, 2010 Los Angeles, CA Click here for more information. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
Superior Court (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 830 cited in those decisions, this is the first published California case holding that CEQA’s 10-day service provision operates as a statute of limitations, which competes with and trumps the 90-day service statute of limitations of Government Code § 65009(c)(1). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473. stated, “despite [CEQA’s evident concern with protecting the environment and human health, its relevant provisions are best read to focus almost entirely on how projects affect the environment. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am
LEXIS 26 (Appeals Board noteworthy panel decision), confirms that despite the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Zurich American Ins. [read post]
