Search for: "Los Angeles v. Superior Court" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
 BC410890) APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
County of Madera); and appropriate remedies in circumstances in which the court finds CEQA error (Land Value 77, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:11 pm by Wystan M. Ackerman
Ct., Los Angeles County), the named plaintiffs assert a variety of claims against Allstate arising from their claim for smoke damage to their house from the “Station Fire” in Southern California in August of 2009. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 1:08 am
Los Angeles Superior Court Survives Its First Furlough The National Law Journal Los Angeles County Superior Court survived the first of 12 days of self-imposed job furloughs Wednesday. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
Superior Court of Los Angeles that all workers, including gig workers, were presumptively employees, meaning that they get the benefits the California Legislature has provided, i.e. minimum wage and overtime, social security, sick pay and family leave, unemployment compensation, workers compensation, reimbursement for travel expenses (in the case of drivers, that might include registration, insurance, licensing, car depreciation) and protection against… [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:24 am by Daniel J. Sargent
The prospects looked bright—until, ironically, an appellate court in Los Angeles accepted Sei Fujii’s claim that the UN Charter trumped California law. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
Over half an hour after the execution began, a doctor wearing a blue hood to cover his face entered the execution chamber to check Angel Diaz's vital signs. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 12:22 pm
The Los Angeles Superior Court order issued Tuesday prohibits the Center for Medical Progress from releasing any video of three high-ranking StemExpress officials taken at a restaurant in May. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:24 am by Sean Wajert
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 2009 WL 4044429 (Cal. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
StemExpress has wanted California’s Superior Court in Los Angeles to restrain the Center for Medical Progress from disseminating undercover videos starring their executives. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:44 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:06 am by Jacobs Paul
The California Supreme Court case of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Richland of Los Angeles, answered that the Act is “extremely technical,” and interpretations of it by lower courts are “all across the board,” so it should not be understood as a promise of digital privacy. [read post]