Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2017, 3:26 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:44 am
Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
" United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
United States (07-513), on whether courts must suppress evidence seized during an arrest made as a result of faulty information provided by another law enforcement agency. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:05 pm
Tea Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 5:43 am
" United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:17 am
Yesterday, May 18th, the United States Supreme Court issued Ashcroft, Former Attorney General v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:26 am
PACER is a service of the United States Judiciary. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
However, the judge did not err in applying Article 7(1)(e); what he had actually done was to state that the policy underlying that article was relevant to the assessment of whether there was a sufficient similarity for the purposes of Article 9(1)(c), both the mark and the sign being shapes. * An assessment of similarity had to be carried out on a global basis by reference to the degree of similarity between the mark and the sign (here the Court cited Case C-252/07 Intel… [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:38 am
”) State of Ohio v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:46 am
Applicant argued that Opposer’s use of the HAWKWIND mark in the United States for musical recordings (1,000 albums sold per year) was de minimis and that Opposer had abandoned the mark for live musical performances, not having performed in the US for over 10 years. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
Patents The Kluwer Patent Blog focuses on the Unitary Patent system, considering that Brexit should not result in delays to German ratification of the Unitary Patent Court Agreement, as well as examining the progress of other Unitary Patent Court Member States in its pursuit of ratification.The IPWatchdog provides an overview of the drone delivery technology patent battle between Amazon and Walmart, who from June 2018 to June 2019 have filed 54 and 97 drone… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:33 am
California and United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:04 am
Fourth Street, San Jose, CA 95113, in Dave Brock v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:14 am
Case date: 19 May 2022 Case number: No. 21-56133 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:56 pm
Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
Sociologist and expert on the states Mark Regnerus tried to revive this theory in recent years, particularly in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:07 am
Mwangi, Request for Advisory Opinion by the Pan African Lawyers Union (Palu) on the Compatibility of Vagrancy Laws with the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and Other Human Rights Instruments Applicable in Africa, No. 001/2018 Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawThe United States Recognizes the Human Right to a Clean, Healthy, and Sustainable EnvironmentSignatories of the U.S. [read post]
