Search for: "Matter of D.(daniel)"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2015, 7:13 am
As has been said many times by this Office and as a matter of good practice, primary responsibility here should be about noninfringing uses. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:30 am
Notably, Schiff (D-Calif.) himself has suggested some dissatisfaction with the report’s focus on Trump, hinting at some of what might have been left out of the final document in the name of consensus. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Bratvold, Daniel J. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Bratvold, Daniel J. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 7:34 am
If the subject matter was obtained by honest means, should any new discoveries that are legitimately patentable as scientific innovations truly need to be credited to a vaguer, sometimes unverified body of local knowledge that set the inventor on his journey? [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:00 pm
(One small example: denying and then admitting paying off Stormy Daniels.) [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 12:01 am
CINDY COHNThat’s Danielle Blunt. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:00 am
What matters for comparative policy purposes are the harms terrorism brings about (including the knock-on and remote ones it threatens to bring about). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
For example, Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner assert that the removal would be improper if it was done for improper motives: namely “personal, pecuniary, or purely partisan ends. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm
By: David A. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 8:31 am
There are some interesting problems here, and no easy solutions—I’d love to get your take on that. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
” He added that it was the “worst agreement I’d ever seen . . . . [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Jan D. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:46 am
” He certified the following question to the Georgia Supreme Court: Does the business judgment rule in Georgia preclude as a matter of law a claim for ordinary negligence against the officers and directors of a bank in a lawsuit brought by the FDIC as receiver for the bank? [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 8:33 pm
I swore I would never, ever, ever prosecute juveniles (still thinking, in my naïveté, that I would have had a choice in the matter) so I didn't feel conflicted about defending them. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
I’m inclined to agree with Daniel Deacon that this “little bit wrong” rule is unsound. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 11:57 pm
Senate Paul D. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Bankruptcy Court - CovingtonJAMES D. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 10:12 pm
If you’re Karen Silkwood or Daniel Ellsberg, it would be, but I have grave doubts that the people complaining to me are in that league. [read post]
