Search for: "Pace v. State"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2024, 9:25 am
Mark Rothko (1903-1970) is a central figure in Abstract Expressionism, a movement that emerged in the United States during the 1940s and 1950s. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
This is a conversation to be continued. _____________ [1] Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
The concern is that the pace with which the ABA may react to technological changes is going to lag literally years behind the pace of the change itself. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
(RT: And the existence of entities motivated to make it fail, pace Lauren Willis!) [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
These awards cannot be enforced against the defendant in the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:57 am
” Judge Scheindlin also found that the plaintiffs had presented sufficient evidence to raise an issue of fact as to whether the defendants acted with the requisite state of mind. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:52 am
Lord Devlin in Hussein v Chong Fook Kam (1970) defined it by saying: ‘suspicion in its ordinary meaning is a state of conjecture or surmise where proof is lacking; ‘I suspect but I cannot prove’…suspicion can take into account matters that could not be put in evidence at all. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:40 am
This argument has never been tested by the UK or EU courts, instead only arising when there is an underlying disability that prevents carrying a pregnancy (Murphy v Slough Borough Council [2005] ICR 721; Case C-167/12 CD v ST [2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:169; Case C-363/12 Z v A (Re Equal Treatment) ECLI:EU:C:2014:159). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am
Although the legal premise for such cases arose in the 1980s (see, for example State (O’Connell) v Fawsitt [1986] I.R. 362 and Murphy v DPP [1989] I.L.R.M. 71) real interest in the “missing evidence” concept as a method to seek to force the prohibition of an impending trial did not gather pace until the early 2000s. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am
The Court generally does not control the pace at which new cases are considered for potential review. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Bank of China Ltd.: In Keren Elmaliach v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Bank of China Ltd.: In Keren Elmaliach v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 7:44 am
Brief of State-Appellee at 29, State v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:05 pm
In a 2019 decision, Marchand v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm
It is the challengers, Texas has countered, who have slowed the pace. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:26 am
[i] Data Protection Commission v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:48 am
That changed abruptly in 2017 with the Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
