Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 4:47 pm
Earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:23 pm
Specifically, the court denied certiorari in United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:22 am
One might joke that Monday’s order in Boyer v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:00 pm
And it now is grown by more than 90 percent of the 275,000 soybean farms in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:18 pm
United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
As Justice Scalia noted in his plurality opinion in Vieth v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:04 pm
– Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court, commenting on several cases in which he believed SCOTUS had made mistakes of political judgment. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm
United States Dept. of Transp., 879 F. 3d 339, 344 (CADC 2018). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am
Lyle Dennison, reporter for the SCOTUSblog (Supreme Court of the United States Blog), stated in his blog dated June 20th, 2011 that it appears that each woman in the class-action suit in Dukes v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:16 pm
The case of Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
United States, where it rejected Congress’s attempt to force the states to choose between conforming to federal radioactive waste regulations or take title to the waste, Justice Scalia stated: "The Federal Government may not compel the States to enact or administer a federal regulatory program. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:40 am
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, decided in 1878. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:20 pm
(An amusing aside: Justice Scalia begins the opinion with a dig at Congress's penchant for silly statute titles intended to spell out a neat acronym (like "P.A.T.R.I.O.T. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:06 am
United States and by Justice Scalia in Printz v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:46 am
The Department of Justice of the United States is wellaware of these proceedings and has not chosen to seek ourintervention. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:28 am
(See Lawrence v. [read post]
