Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 3,525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2017, 3:37 pm
Pa. 2008); United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 12:19 pm
AM GENERAL, LLC et al – United States District Court – District Court of New Jersey – August 4th, 2017) involves a claim of asbestos exposure. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 2:04 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:06 am
LEXIS 13381 (decided July 25, 2017), the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concluded that an employer who subjects an employee who is a licensed professional to workplace retaliation for refusing to violate a code of professional conduct violates New Jersey’s whistleblowing law, i.e., New Jersey’s Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA). [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 9:13 am
As head of L’Oreal USA’s regional patent team in Clark, New Jersey, the employee oversaw the process for patenting the company’s newly developed products and inventions. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
In deciding to remand an action to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County (the “State Court”), the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (the “District Court”) found that although removal statutes must generally be strictly construed, with any doubt to be resolved in favor of remand, the presumption against removal does not apply to class actions invoking jurisdiction… [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am
Getting a legal name change in NJ for a minor child certainly requires more steps and considerations than someone over the age of 18; however, the courts in New Jersey carefully contemplate a myriad of factors to determine if doing so is in the best interest of the child. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am
Getting a legal name change in NJ for a minor child certainly requires more steps and considerations than someone over the age of 18; however, the courts in New Jersey carefully contemplate a myriad of factors to determine if doing so is in the best interest of the child. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am
Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 671 (1983), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that the due process and equal protection principles of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibit ‘‘punishing a person for his poverty. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:02 pm
Ari Sauer is licensed to practice law through the states of Tennessee, New York and New Jersey but is eligible to assist clients from throughout the US. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
§ 2A:32B-2.Things did not go well for the State of New Jersey in D.N.J. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:10 am
Horses in New Jersey are highly regarded. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:40 pm
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania upheld that standard in Castleberry v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:40 pm
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania upheld that standard in Castleberry v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 2:16 pm
Projections by New Jersey United for Marijuana Reform and New Jersey Policy Perspective states a federal study estimating 365,900 people in New Jersey age 21 and over illegally use marijuana on a monthly basis, consuming 2.53 million ounces a year. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:42 am
Susinno then filed a TCPA class action in New Jersey federal court, and WOW moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:57 am
Most notably, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in an en banc decision that a New Jersey statute seeking to legalize sports wagering was preempted by PAPSA and that PAPSA was a constitutionally valid exercise of congressional power. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:57 am
Most notably, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held in an en banc decision that a New Jersey statute seeking to legalize sports wagering was preempted by PAPSA and that PAPSA was a constitutionally valid exercise of congressional power. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
Nine states, including Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont, have mandated the removal of conviction history questions from job applications for private employers. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
Nine states, including Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont, have mandated the removal of conviction history questions from job applications for private employers. [read post]
