Search for: "State v. Born" Results 1161 - 1180 of 4,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
Because whether you're a "child" of the deceased for Social Security purposes depends upon state law. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Constitution; and (2) whether Ohio’s refusal to recognize a judgment of adoption of an Ohio-born child issued to a same-sex couple by the courts of a sister state violates the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm by Scott Bomboy
Volokh also wrote that the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
Updated information on the state of Ohio’s response to the petition in Henry v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
Hence, the Fourteenth Amendment was born in 1868. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:34 am by Marty Lederman
United States, No. 09-5801, an equal protection challenge to the federal government’s disparate treatment of male and female U.S. citizens for purposes of establishing the citizenship of their children born overseas. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Upon being informed that none did, he stated that the hearing was closed. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:46 am by Hanlon Law, PA
If the defendant was born in 1963, the defendant could be eligible for relief under the Florida Supreme Court decision in Atwell v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:18 am by Scott Stewart
The principle the court invoked originated with cases involving state infringement on the fundamental right to marry, in particular Zablocki v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:08 am
Supreme Court ruled in Panetti v. [read post]