Search for: "State v. C. Johnson" Results 1161 - 1180 of 1,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2011, 11:21 am by Christa Culver
HolderDocket: 10-694Issue(s): Whether a lawful permanent resident who was convicted by guilty plea of an offense that renders him deportable and excludable under differently phrased statutory subsections, but who did not depart and reenter the United States between his conviction and the commencement of removal proceedings, is categorically foreclosed from seeking discretionary relief from removal under former Section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.Certiorari stage… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 1:40 am
 60 A724 Gottfried (MS) -- Provides clarification regarding retaliation against a patient or a patient's legal representative for asserting such patient's right of action BLURB : Pub Heal. retaliation v. patient Last Act: 06/09/09 signed chap.6061 A763 Gottfried (MS) -- Provides clarification on the private right of action by a patient of a residential health care facility BLURB : Pub Heal. right of action Last Act:… [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
Johnson was married to artist Dutterrer and when he passed away in 2007, he left all of his artwork to Johnson in his will. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Under the facts and circumstances presented, it found no abuse of discretion in Supreme Courts determination to, effectively, adjust the equitable distribution award to reflect an excessive temporary maintenance award (see Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
The Guidelines language defining “crime of violence” in §4B1.2(a)(2) is the same language found unconstitutionally vague in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
Anderson and State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 11:56 am
However, at the hearing, respondent, citing Matter of Ruiz v MVAIC (19 AD2d 832 [2d Dept 1963]) and Byrd v Johnson (60 AD2d 900 [2d Dept 1978]) and their progeny, argued further that, even if the court is satisfied that petitioner has otherwise complied with subdivision (b) of section 5218 of the Insurance Law, petitioner, in order to satisfy the "reasonable efforts" requirement of subdivision (b) (5), must first exhaust his remedy and conclude a subdivision… [read post]