Search for: "State v. District Court of Ninth Judicial District"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
However, the United States District Court, District of Columbia did state in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
” “If I were not constrained by which I believe is binding precedent from the Ninth Circuit, and on-point precedent from other circuits, I would hold Section 1713 [Tester’s rider] is unconstitutional because it violates the Separation of Powers doctrine articulated by the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
Williams, 13-587, is a state-on-top capital habeas petition out of the Ninth Sixth Tenth (?!?) [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am
DoodyDocket: 09-1443Issue(s): Whether the Ninth Circuit disregarded the AEDPA and this Court’s recent decision in Florida v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
The respondent, however, declined the offer; and the district court refused to declare that the offer had mooted the respondent’s claims. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 5:01 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:05 am
Delrahim expressly desires to change Supreme Court precedent, whereas the district court and this Court are required to apply existing law. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:30 am
Pryor appealed this decision to the Ninth District Court of Appeals. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
Servs. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:37 am
After that, let’s goose-step down to every district court where Kozinski served as a trial judge. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
” (quoting the district court)) United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Rippy v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 11:31 pm
Except when authorized by statute or federal rule, or the Judicial Conference of the United States, no case or document shall be filed under seal without prior approval by the Court. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 12:13 pm
See, e.g., Kuklinski v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
After evaluating her claim, the district court ruled in favor of Match.com, citing Title 47, Section 230 of the United States Code, known as the Communications Decency Act (CDA). [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
The student will consider how political communities rank laws—from constitution to statute, judicial decision and regulation. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 8:33 pm
Arpaio . . . in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
