Search for: "State v. Kent"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
Christopher Buccafusco, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law/Benjamin N. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:30 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm
Any order requiring any sort of journalistic material to be handed over to the state engages the right to freedom of expression of publishers and broadcasters under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and will amount to an interference for the purposes of Article 10 (see eg Handyside v United Kingdom and Tillack v Belgium). [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 4:05 am
State) and Venis' case. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times discusses a legislative response to United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 7:23 am
Hawkes Co. and Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:39 pm
On August 30, 2012, the Federal District Court of Louisiana, Western District, LaFayette Division, published its opinion in Bessard v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
[Link] Upcoming Events: The Chicago-Kent Supreme Court IP Review will be held on September 15th at Chicago-Kent College of Law. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:39 am
A big one is Ames v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
(Patent Baristas) (Patent Baristas) (Patent Baristas) (Hal Wegner) (IP Updates) (Patent Docs) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (PLI) US: Oral arguments completed in Tafas, GSK v Dudas (Hal Wegner) (Patent Prospector) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (PLI) (PLI) (Patent Docs) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference:… [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 7:05 am
This has also been voiced in the US District Court for the District of Columbia in its ruling in Thaler v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:46 am
EU Regulations are directly effective in all member states. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm
Juarez v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
As LaCroix later explains, this consensus “held that slavery was a local matter, that the states alone could regulate it, and that therefore the U.S. government lacked authority over slavery in the states” (216). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am
Blogger Jack of Kent reports that Migration Watch has dropped the action. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
There were news reports of another footballer obtaining a “Clark Kent” injunction (see the report in the Daily Telegraph). [read post]
31 May 2011, 5:00 pm
Kent Sch. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:10 pm
See Kent v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
Kent case shows how reluctant courts can be to admit that §337(a) means what it says (in Farm Raised Salmon, the pending Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm
State v. [read post]
