Search for: "State v. Major"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 45,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Ormondroyd Ch was unconvinced by the justification, stating: “[20]. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Resource Kit is a frequently updated collection of current Practical Guidance materials on generative AI, ChatGPT, and similar tools. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Key US Supreme Court decisions, such as Jones v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:18 am
LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
The New York State Court of Appeals has held that the City Human Rights Law, one of the most expansive in the nation, does not allow plaintiffs to sue co-workers for discrimination, including the creation of a hostile work environment.The case is Russell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:41 am
And in Prosecutor v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
Martin Kratz, R. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, Republic of Arg. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In 1969, in Tinker v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:08 pm
Lamprecht v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
An OLC opinion stating that the sitting President cannot be indicted is cold comfort for me. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:58 pm
In Tube-Mac Indus. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
Cir. 1973) (holding that Section 6(g) “empowered [the FTC] to promulgate substantive rules of business conduct”); United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
The major questions doctrine had a good deal of predictive support. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am
Most recently, on April 9, 2024 a majority of the Arizona Supreme Court resurrected an 1864 territorial law banning all abortions except to save the life of the pregnant woman in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am
It is our solemn duty to diligently guard these rights regardless of the crime charged, the reputation of the accused, or the pressure to convict (see Boyd v United States, 116 US 616, 635 [1886] [“It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon”]). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 10:21 am
As the majority states in this case, the defendant had known "explosive tendencies. [read post]