Search for: "U. S. v. Court" Results 1161 - 1180 of 10,793
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2022, 6:12 am by Dan Bressler
” [See the complete article for more detail on]: “The first was Larsen v Larsen (2022 NY Slip Op 32415(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County July 18, 2022]“ “Less than a month after Larsen, the Delaware Supreme Court, in Griffith v Stein (___A3d ___ [Del Aug. 16, 2022]“ “Trump’s Lawyers May Become Witnesses or Targets in Documents Investigation” — “Two lawyers for former President Donald J. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 11:39 am by Eric Goldman
The court summarizes: On the continuum of choreography, the Steps are closer to a short routine like the “Floss” dance or to the “U, S, A” movements, neither of which would not be protectable. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 1:31 pm by David Kopel
The Supplement begins with 98 pages on the Supreme Court's June 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 10:15 am by Dunstan Barnes
This case may prove to be the most significant Supreme Court fair use case to date. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 9:28 am by Carlos Kelly
DeSantis, the Fifth District Court of Appeal decided that Governor DeSantis’s executive orders from March 2020 did not amount to a taking of private property. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 9:28 am by Carlos Kelly
DeSantis, the Fifth District Court of Appeal decided that Governor DeSantis’s executive orders from March 2020 did not amount to a taking of private property. [read post]
  Rather than establishing a record of success, the primary effect has been to create uncertainty, as the agencies struggle with institutional constraints and have yet to achieve groundbreaking victories in court. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Vaccine refusal case law has focused on the religious beliefs of the parents,[19] but the Supreme Court has explicitly noted that children have the right to exercise their religion.[20] The scope of this right for young people has yet to be defined by the Supreme Court,[21] but is “not accorded the same scope as an adult’s right to free exercise,” limited by the state’s interest in health the parent’s rights to control the… [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:40 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Larsen Decision The first was Larsen v Larsen (2022 NY Slip Op 32415(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County July 18, 2022]), in which Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman considered and rejected a pre-answer dismissal challenge to a shareholder derivative suit based upon the suing minority shareholder’s alleged conflict of interest. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  2022 NY Slip Op 50826(U)  Decided on August 26, 2022  Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J. is a typical case. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm by Kalvis Golde
The court found that the company’s executives knew they were reporting higher U&C prices. [read post]