Search for: "US v. Stone" Results 1161 - 1180 of 2,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2008, 7:33 am
These images depict some of the villages and the stone quarry we visited while in Uttar Pradesh. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
United States The Data Protection Report has an article on the Executive Order signed by President Biden at the end of last month prohibiting executive departments and agencies of the US Government from using commercial spyware where they determine that such use poses significant counterintelligence or security risks to the US Government or significant risk of improper use by a foreign government or person. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:50 am by Daniel Schwartz
" #cbftech @malson4 Carolene Products - Justice Stone: "Fine, fine, I will put it in a footnote. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Reasonable readers must be taught that that the First Amendment allows us the “breathing space” to make such errors (See, New York Times Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Kat friend John William Shaw (Stone King LLP) ponders over the potential outcome of one of the cases if it were heard in the UK. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
| BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product | (Belatedly) remembering Raymond Niro, the most influential person in patent litigation whom you may have never heard of | Genuine use of three dimensional EU trade marks - heated arguments over ovens | Wild Boys Sometimes Lose It: Duran Duran fail to reclaim their US copyright |Around the IP Blogs Never Too Late 125 [week ending on Sunday 4… [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 9:19 pm
The IPKat round-ups, starting today, are the classical two-birds-and-one-stone solution. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
If a corporate dissolution contest could be re-imagined as a TV game show, I'd call the case of Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:26 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
”{See also, Russell & Anor v Stone (t/a PSP Consultants) & Ors [2017] EWHC 1555 (TCC)}The said case suggests that English law is not averse to an agreement, which provides even for extension of limitation period since the argument regarding whether the agreement had actually extended the time was considered and rejected not on the basis of whether law allows it but on the basis of construction of contract (see, Paras 46 to 56 of Russell v Stone). [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 10:28 pm
This tends to reinforce my understanding that the "good faithy version of loyalty" created by the Delaware Supreme Court in Stone v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:41 am
" "[W]e do not require that the decisional process used by the employer be optimal or that it left no stone unturned. [read post]
5 May 2008, 12:00 am
" "[W]e do not require that the decisional process used by the employer be optimal or that it left no stone unturned. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v… [read post]