Search for: "United States v. Under Seal"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 1,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 12:22 pm
See, for example:Why Airplanes Crash: Aviation Safety in a Changing World by Clinton V. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:32 am
Last Act: 02/23/10 REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCES6902 VALESKY -- Requires the removal or covering of inapplicable highway work zone traffic control signs No Same asBLURB : V & T L. removal work zone signs Last Act: 02/23/10 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATIONLast Action Date: 02/24/10(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:27 am
(It had previously been under seal.) [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 5:11 am
The syringes recalled were from a number of lots where there was a concern that unit package seal integrity may have been compromised for some of them. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:22 am
"—Abstract.Mikhail V. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:30 pm
United States, 312 F.2d 418 (Ct. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm
The Supreme Court has long emphasized, as it explained in Flast v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:44 pm
A Historical Departure Inside a small federal courtroom in south Florida in late June, prosecutor James Pearce painted a sweeping history of the role that special prosecutors — a phrase often used interchangeably with the more formal and contemporary “special counsel” — have played in the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Simply stated, Civil Investigative Demands used in False Claims Act investigations are essentially subpoenas authorized under 31 U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
Yet a highly effective mechanism exists for recovery of funds to the United States Treasury while simultaneously providing a significant economic incentive for the person who files suit. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 5:13 am
Rashmi Srivastava v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm
Under the FISA Amendment Act of 2008, reauthorized in 2012, warrantless wiretapping was approved by federal authorities, although this is currently being challenged and fought against via the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Clapper v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:05 am
” Yet, the report only recommends that the Israeli government comply “fully and immediately” with the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) orders in the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
They will discuss the evidence underlying the presumption, the standards for "internationally wrongful acts,” possible treaty violations, and the measures a state may take under international law in response. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
‘‘(v) NARROWEST POSSIBLE SCOPE OFEXCEPTION. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
