Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1161 - 1180
of 6,907
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2012, 4:02 am
It wasn't a demand. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 12:03 pm
Then we're back to square one. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
JL: I don't think so. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 12:20 am
We reported last week that Judge Anne Conway had orally granted summary judgment in the first two test cases in the Seroquel MDL, and that a written order would be forthcoming.We checked the MDL docket last night and didn't see an order, so we told you this morning that the promised written order had not yet been entered.We lied.Judge Conway docketed the order in the individual case, Guinn v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 10:54 am
Don't want the jury to reach its own judgment? [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 5:15 am
As he notes, "CEOs don't seem to be having fun" and, as a result, it shouldn't be surprising that they seek "solace in high pay. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 3:18 am
The obligation persists.Then again, I don't have a logo. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 1:02 pm
Hmmm.Lawyer: Mary, I know you maybe don't want to, but if George did that and you can prove it, we'll nail his ass to the wall.Mary: Really? [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
And don't underestimate the value of the odd UK registration in the portfolio – starting at £170 a go, they come with a near priceless anti-torpedo coating. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 10:35 am
If you require a defense for a Broward felony charge and you qualify for a public defender, you don't have a say in who you get. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 5:47 am
"We see a level of courtesy we don't see in our country," O'Connor said. [read post]
8 Jan 2022, 1:27 am
That's why we still haven't heard, and most likely won't hear, about any case where the new statute actually strengthened a defendant's position.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:41 am
Second, don't rub his nose in it by pointing out that you won't engage in similar impropriety, even though the judge did. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 4:37 am
(Turns out it wasn't the Justice Department, but an agency I hadn't heard of made up of federal circuit court judges called the Judicial Conference; I don't closely follow the federal judiciary, I'm afraid.) [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:24 pm
Our priorities when it comes to criminal justice don't exist anymore. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 7:36 pm
Don't buy into it. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:32 am
Furthermore, the approach taken in the Court leaves us with a working test which we, as lawyers, can apply to their own situations, but reassures us that we don’t need to balance the needs and rights of our client with the fear of reprimand if we are working from a factual foundation and in good faith. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 11:50 am
Lawyers don't have any obligation to disclose information harmful to their client's position during settlement discussions, the North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled today in Hardin v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 6:28 am
The DNA lab's other big problem was that it had a leaky roof and most of the historical DNA evidence was destroyed and couldn't be re-tested.See prior, related Grits posts:Digesting new Daubert opinion on DNA mixturesMost crime labs accused innocent person in DNA mixture studyA reluctant scoop: Changing interpretations of DNA mixtures vex legal systemLabs must correct wrong DNA mixture analyses, learn when to recognize ';crap039;Resources… [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:49 pm
We don't buy it. [read post]