Search for: "*1**u.s. v. Poole" Results 101 - 120 of 832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2022, 7:14 am by Jason Rantanen
  Under Section 1, the rule of reason analysis as applied to patent pools is generally satisfied when pool members are free to license the pooled patents individually, as is the case with Avanci. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:13 pm by Florian Mueller
It merely affirms the district court--unanimously--with respect to the dismissal of Conti's Sherman Act Section 1 and 2 claims. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
In 2009, off-exchange trading accounted for a quarter of U.S. equity volume. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 2:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
Winfrey 21-1466Issues: (1) Whether a law enforcement officer violates clearly established law under the Supreme Court’s decision in Franks v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:51 pm by Javier Dominguez
But it would double the pool of attorneys qualified for appointment. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:01 am by Florian Mueller
You can't blame a patent pool for offering a certain license but not another as long as it doesn't contractually prevent its licensors from entering into whatever bilateral license they wish to grant. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 9:03 am by Alvaro Marañon
The order also requests the relevant federal agencies and departments to explore and submit a report on the adoption of a U.S. central bank digital currency. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:40 pm by Florian Mueller
High fives in the patent pool industry for he Fifth Circuit opinion.At a time when Avanci is working on a 5G SEP pool, it clearly has momentum on multiple fronts:LG joined its 3G/4G pools,Daimler took its license,Volkswagen told a U.S. court that it's close to settling a dispute with Avanci licensor Acer over the fact that VW's license covers only 3G--not 4G--for most of its connected cars, andit has now not only fended off Conti's appeal but even… [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 1:06 am by Florian Mueller
This morning's patent licensing and litigation news comes from the world's #1 patent enforcement hotspot, the Landgericht München I (Munich I Regional Court):The Munich trial in IP Bridge v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:49 am by Alexander J. Davie
The audit would need to: (1) be performed by an independent public accountant that meets the standards of independence in rule 2-01(b) and (c) of Regulation S-X that is registered with and subject to regular inspection of the PCAOB; (2) meet the definition of audit in rule 1-02(d) of Regulation S-X, the professional engagement period of which shall begin and end as indicated in Regulation S-X rule 2-01(f)(5); and (3) be prepared in accordance with GAAP, or in the case of a… [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
” Figure 1: Overview of measures of alleged opportunistic conduct by SEP enforcers Opportunistic behavior (Table 1 sequence, Table 3 numbering) [8] Description[9](emphasis added) Rebuttal[10] 1. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:19 am by Florian Mueller
That is the question that, on the other side of the Pond, the Dusseldorf Regional Court referred to the European Court of Justice in Nokia v. [read post]