Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 101 - 120
of 11,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 7:15 am
As previously discussed, BC Courts take a broad view of relevance when it comes to examination for discovery. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:02 am
The DAB has been designed to provide an impartial, independent review of disputed agency decisions under a wide variety of statutory and regulatory provisions.[3] This article examines the DAB in more detail, focusing on the Board’s appellate role when adjudicating exclusion, provider enrollment actions and HIPAA administrative simplification violations. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 9:18 am
Randall received a Notice of Telephone Hearing to take place on April 6, 2017 before an Appeal Tribunal Hearing Examiner. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:35 am
A representative claim on appeal read: 1. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:01 am
Such a reading would prohibit immediate appeal of a rejection of a claim added in the last response. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
But read more closely s31G(6) only gives the court this power where a litigant in person is UNABLE to cross examine effectively – which of course does not always apply, and in particular doesn’t empower the court to stop the cross examination of a litigant in person who thinks he is doing fine thank you very much, but who may be traumatising a vulnerable witness. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 12:25 pm
A better strategy would be to avoid the exam and appeal the denial to the next stage in the process. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:58 am
On the side: also Neoperl appealed to the CJEU, but Neoperl’s appeal did not successfully take the hurdle of admission (see Case C-64/23 P). [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 10:46 am
Continue reading [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:58 am
A recent New Jersey employment law decision examined the procedures for reopening a Civil Service disciplinary appeal because of newly discovered evidence. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 8:12 pm
This is a problem for Appellants because a minor mistake (forgetting to file a concurrent amendment cancelling non-appealed claims) now results in a significant delay in getting the case before the Board.As one who frequently appeals, I was thrilled to read that the PTO has decided to address this problem by modifying the CFR rules which govern appeals! [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:10 am
On appeal the Supreme Court of Ohio agreed, and stated that Mignella’s claim should remain suspended until she attended a second examination. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:52 am
Lars de HaasV.O.The Board of Appeal found that the examining division had committed a substantial procedural violation by raising tentative patentability objections rather than completing an improperly justified incomplete search. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:30 am
Sources: https://www.liftonline.org/guide/topic-language/2074 Read More [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) affirmed the Examiner’s rejection of all 25 claims of U.S. [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:03 pm
Continue reading [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:03 pm
Continue reading [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:03 pm
Continue reading [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:03 pm
Continue reading [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 10:57 am
Even though much of the work of Appeals comes from examinations, its jurisdiction has expanded over the last few years. [read post]
