Search for: "ALEXANDER v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE" Results 101 - 120 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
California: Defense attorney must follow through on appeal after conviction. 1967 United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 5:40 pm by Law Lady
GUILLERMO MARTINEZ, Appellee. 3rd District.Criminal law -- Juveniles -- Battery -- Closing argument -- No abuse of discretion in trial court's not allowing defense to argue self-defense in closing argument, a defense not previously raised, where defense could not reasonably have been inferred from any evidence at trialM.S., A JUVENILE, Appellant, vs. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
Instead, the Justice Department has argued that the resolution of the dispute should be left to the two branches. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
. Defense Official Quits in Wake of Remarks About Guantanamo Prisoners' Lawyers The Associated Press A senior Pentagon official resigned last week over controversial remarks in which he criticized lawyers who represent terrorism suspects, the Defense Department said. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Steve sang ’Happy Birthday’ to Boumediene v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Alexander, No. 07-1758 A sentence for possessing crack cocaine with the intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not commit a plain error in designating defendant a career offender for sentencing purposes as he committed a prior crime of violence, and he otherwise satisfied the criteria necessary to be considered a career offender; and 2) the sentence was otherwise reasonable. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
  Nixon announced that he was appointing the Secretary of Defense, Elliot Richardson, to be the next Attorney General. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Missouri Dep't of Corr., No. 07-1598 In an action raising a retaliation claim under Title VII against plaintiff's employer, a state correctional department, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, for purposes of a prima facie retaliation case: 1) a single comment at issue in the case was insufficient as a matter of law to support an objectively reasonable belief it amounted to unlawful sexual harassment; and 2) under the facts of the case, no reasonable person coul [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Department of Defense, in which a unanimous court held that challenges to the “waters of the United States” rule must be filed in federal district courts, remarking that “[t]he government’s arguments were grounded primarily in judicial and administrative convenience rather than statutory text, which, in this textualist era, is a pretty good recipe for a 9-0 loss. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Jan. 6 Text Messages Wiped from Phones of Key Trump Pentagon Officials CNN – Tierny Sneed and Zachary Cohen | Published: 8/2/2022 The Department of Defense (DOD) wiped the phones of top departing DOD and Army officials at the end of the Trump administration, deleting any texts from key witnesses to events surrounding the attack on the U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Adeline Rolnick
Natural Resources Defense Council decision. [read post]