Search for: "ALLES v. INTERSTATE POWER CO."
Results 101 - 120
of 469
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2021, 11:36 am
The NCAA didn't just lose in today's Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:56 am
Their appellate brief paid scant attention to the CPLR 503 vs. 507 issue and concentrated almost all its fire power on its argument that the lower court erred by not retaining venue for the convenience of witnesses under CPLR 510(3). [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm
However, all the communications were apparently via Brodsky in Colorado. [read post]
2 May 2021, 9:59 am
ShareThe Supreme Court on Wednesday heard argument in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 7:02 am
The vote in Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 10:32 am
Azar, the court doesn't directly consider nondelegation at all, focusing strictly on statutory arguments of the sort summarized by co-blogger Josh Blackman here. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
(RLUIPA also invokes congressional power to regulate foreign, interstate, and tribal commerce, but courts have focused on the spending power.) [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:17 am
These guidelines apply to all relevant cases, including those that focus on domestic terrorism. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
The developer now urges the court to revisit its open-ended test for assessing regulatory takings under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:08 am
Now what about Texas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm
Gannett Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
I promised quite a while ago to say more about Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
QUARTET: MCNALLY, SKILLING, MCDONNELL, AND KELLY The federal wire fraud statute[v] prohibits the use of the interstate “wires” to further a “scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
For example, in Winston v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Five Justices in 2012 thought that Congress lacked the authority to impose a purchase mandate under its power to regulate interstate commerce, but a different five Justices (with Chief Justice Roberts providing the swing vote) said that the mandate was nonetheless valid as a conditional exercise of the power to tax. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
One involves their discussion of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC), which is a specific application of the more general concept of a National Popular Vote (NPV] replacing the constitutional electoral vote. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
At the very least, don’t the expressed views of five Justices that these powers are insufficient create something that is, as fellow Verdict columnist Mike Dorf put it in an amicus brief co-authored with Marty Lederman, “for all practical purposes precedential”? [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 10:28 pm
In McKeon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Rather than describing the exchange of a specific envelope of cash, the silica MDL opinion described an ongoing course of corrupt remuneration paid to medical professionals who were all too willing to bend their opinions and subvert medical standards. [read post]
