Search for: "Accutane Litigation"
Results 101 - 111
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2007, 10:52 am
., 289 F.3d 1193, 1211 (10th Cir. 2002) (ADEs "contain only limited information" and are "unreliable evidence of causation"); In re: Accutane Products Liability Litigation, 2007 WL 1288354, at *3 (M.D. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Thus some inordinately long-running litigation (more than seven years) finally came to an end. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 12:39 pm
Many litigations begin before there is any consensus on one side or the other. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
” In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 2013 WL 174416, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 10:24 am
Fla. 1996), aff’d, 158 F. 3d 588 (11th Cir. 1998); In re Accutane Products Liability Litig., 511 F. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:22 am
From settlement to verdict: In New Jersey, an Accutane trial has resulted in a $2.6M award for inflammatory bowel disease, based on a failure to warn of the disease, according to Tom Lamb at his Drug Injury Watch;And finally a little weekend reading:From Kevin, M.D.: The best anti-smoking ad ever created.From Sheila Scheuerman at TortsProf, top 10 downloads for papers posted on the Social Science Research Network for the last three months in the Journal of Torts & Products… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
For instance, notwithstanding its eventual total victory, the maker of Accutane was forced to withdraw that drug from the market in 2009 due to the litigation cost of defending claims over purported side effects that either didn’t exist or were adequately warned about. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Aug. 20, 2012) (“federal law requires a generic drug to be of the same design as its brand name counterpart”); In re: Accutane Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 3194952, at *2 (M.D. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Litig., 858 F.3d 787, 793 (3d Cir. 2017) (affirming exclusion of causation expert witness) Magistrini v. [read post]
Beecher-Monas Proposes to Abandon Common Sense, Science, and Expert Witnesses for Specific Causation
11 Sep 2015, 3:23 pm
Since expert testimony has become a mainstay of both civil and criminal litigation, this failure to communicate creates a conundrum in which jurists insist on testimony that experts are not capable of giving, and scientists attempt to conform their testimony to what the courts demand, often well beyond the limits of their expertise. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
