Search for: "Adams v. State of North Carolina" Results 101 - 120 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2014, 5:28 am by Amy Howe
The Court will also hear oral argument in the antitrust case North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen reports that the governor and attorney general of North Carolina have taken steps to withdraw the state’s request that the Supreme Court review an appeals court decision striking down the state’s strict voting law, arguing that “getting this case withdrawn would be a big deal and a good thing. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm by David Tanenhaus
North Carolina, continue to ignore Gault and the thinking that went into it. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen notes that supplemental briefs filed in the wake of Whitford may delay disposition of an appeal in a North Carolina partisan-gerrymandering case. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
At his Election Law Blog (here), Rick Hasen covers the ongoing efforts to get the Court to step into a voting dispute in North Carolina with a post that analyzes the challengers’ response to the state. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit striking down a North Carolina law that would requires ultrasounds for women who are pregnant and seeking an abortion; the state has asked the Court to review that ruling. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am by Edith Roberts
Harris, the justices upheld a lower court decision finding that in drawing the boundaries of two congressional districts, North Carolina relied too heavily on race. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:47 am by Amy Howe
’”  And at the AntitrustConnect Blog, Steven Cernak previews the oral arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
North Carolina, another First Amendment ruling, the court struck down a North Carolina law that barred sex offenders from accessing social-media sites that allowed minors to create accounts. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 7:28 pm by Howard Bashman
” blog of The Hollywood Reporter, Eriq Gardner has a post titled “Supreme Court Wrestles With Consequences for Piracy by State Governments; North Carolina tells the high court that the 11th Amendment provides a shield to claims it took a filmmaker’s copyrighted images. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:41 am by Amy Howe
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost weighs in on the challenge to North Carolina’s 2013 election laws and suggests that, because the state may be a “critical” one “in the presidential election, the Supreme Court owes the state, and the nation, a decision that is fair not to one side, but to both. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:22 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak writes that, after the Supreme Court agreed to review New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm by Bexis
”  Id.Both Currier and Adams cite another California case, Blanco v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
The Racial Justice Act and the long struggle with race and the death penalty in North Carolina 88 N C Law Rev 2031 (2010). [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 3:41 pm
  MacLennan, an HIV+ Canadian national, who pled guilty to some sort of commercial crime in federal court in North Carolina in 2005, promptly informed the Bureau of Prisons that he had been diagnosed HIV+ in March 1989. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Constititutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson also discusses Packingham, predicting that the court will find the North Carolina statute unconstitutional. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Common Cause, a challenge to North Carolina’s congressional map, “will be making their arguments to a new audience, one that may not be as receptive as the court that included Justice Kennedy. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am by Amy Howe
  It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]