Search for: "Advanced Computer Services v. MAI SYSTEMS" Results 101 - 120 of 560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  So even if perfect cybersecurity for a given information system could be achieved, it won’t last as changes in that system are deployed. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 9:28 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
However, this transition also brings new occupational hazards and health concerns that our current systems may not be fully equipped to address. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by eorozco
Specifically, Treasury may impose civil penalties of up to the greater of $368,136 (an amount adjusted annually for inflation) or twice the amount of the transaction that is the basis for the violation. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  Especially now that millions of formerly uninsured persons (and potential plaintiffs) have obtained insurance through our quasi-universal health care insurance system, the gap between what health care providers nominally bill for services and what they actually accept as payment in full for those services is huge. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The plaintiff advanced a novel argument on authorizing infringement that a user who posts or advertises the posting of an unauthorized copy of a digital file on a peer to peer file sharing service authorized infringements made by others who use that service to download copies of that file. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:06 am by Bryce Klehm
 The Federal Government must bring to bear the full scope of its authorities and resources to protect and secure its computer systems, whether they are cloud-based, on-premises, or hybrid. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The SEC’s disclosure that its EDGAR system had been had hacked was big news last week, as was the accompanying disclosure that the information accessed may have been used for improper trading. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:40 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 7,972,022 (the ‘022 patent), 7,510,290 (the ‘290 patent), 7,429,117 (the ‘117 patent), 7,318,652 (the ‘652 patent), and 6,948,823 (the ‘823 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): FloLight, LLC of Campbell, California Prompter People, Inc. of Campbell, California Ikan Corporation of Houston, Texas Advanced Business Computer Services, LLC of Reno, Nevada Elation Lighting, Inc. of Los Angeles, California Fotodiox… [read post]