Search for: "Amendments To Rules Regulating the Bar" Results 101 - 120 of 4,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2009, 6:20 am
More regulations on siting. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Supreme Court has told us that content-based bans on speech are subject to strict scrutiny, a heightened level of review that is fatal to many government regulations – at least outside rules that regulate commercial speech generally. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
State bars typically regulate admission to practice by administering an exam testing legal knowledge. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by David Kopel
The key rules from Ezell: use originalism from both 1791 and 1868 to determine if an activity is within the scope of the Second Amendment right. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:42 am by Amy Howe
It is unclear what such a rule would entail,” and there is no support for such a rule in the Supreme Court’s Second Amendment cases. [read post]
The Florida Bar, United States District Court Judge Beth Bloom of the Southern District of Florida ruled last week that it is unconstitutional for the Florida Bar to prevent a lawyer from using past results in advertising their services, saying that the Bar had the burden of establishing that the ban on the use of past results in attorney advertising supports the interests the Rules were designed to promote, and that they failed to meet that burden. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:56 am by Sean Wajert
The Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, a busy mass tort jurisdiction, to say the least, has continued to tinker with its mass tort general rules, last week issuing General Court Regulation No. 2012-03, amending the protocols for cases in the mass tort program. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:21 pm by James Hamilton
The bar group urged the SEC to clarify that this guiding principle remains controlling and therefore that permissible activities in an exempt Rule 506 or 144A offering, including general solicitation and general advertising after the adoption of the new rules, do not constitute directed selling efforts in a contemporaneous Regulation S offering.Although Section 201(b) of the JOBS Act provides that offerings complying with amended Rule 506 must… [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
In England and Wales, the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Bar Standards Board are the regulators. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:59 am by Karen Dyck
Amendments to the Court of Queen’s Bench Rules, effective January 1, 2018, will introduce an overarching requirement that the Court considers proportionality in making orders and directions under those Rules. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 4:21 am by jonathanturley
In reality, the opinion does not reject the underlying goal or even rule out a bar on gun possession in such cases. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:24 pm by Joshua Cossin
State Bar of California that “compelled association” of state bar was justified by the “State’s interest in regulating the legal profession and improving the quality of legal services” is also overturned by the ruling in Janus. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:33 am by Amanda Shanor
“Our decision is not intended to expand existing First Amendment doctrine or to otherwise affect traditional or ordinary economic regulation of commercial activity. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 1:34 pm by Ernest Badway
  This position was described in a position paper prepared by The Committee on Securities Regulation of the New York State Bar Association in August 2002. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:25 am by Howard Friedman
United States, (ND TX, March 26, 2015), a Texas federal district court granted a preliminary injunction ordering the Department of Labor to stay application of a rule amendment that extends the Family and Medical Leave Act to same-sex married couples even in states that do not recognize sane-sex marriage. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 3:43 pm by Orin Kerr
Technically, state bars can't really regulate purely federal law practice in their states. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:28 pm by Shamnad Basheer
The other tricky part of this ruling is that it could be construed as a judicial mandate for legislative amendment. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:09 pm by Amy Howe
The First Amendment bars the government from restricting freedom of speech, but it does not generally apply to private actors, like corporations. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
The final rule revises the OFCCP’s regulations at 41 CFR Parts 60-1, 60-2, 60-4, and 60-50. [read post]