Search for: "American Trading & Production Corp. v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2018, 9:00 am
It defines “blocked assets” to mean any assets “seized or frozen” by the United States pursuant to the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) or International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), two broad authorizations frequently used to impose economic sanctions—including on terrorist organizations and their affiliates. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
United States, 370 U. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
United States, decided in 1926, and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:19 am
Implication of the Lanham Act could result from something as simple as shipping products or materials through the United States, having an agent within the United States, exporting product from the United States, or having a United States company sell infringing products (even if these infringing products never touch United States soil) overseas. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm
They also drew on the Federal Court of Appeal decision in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm
The law permits a president to “deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States,” if he first declares a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA). [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:52 pm
” Intel Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
However, the majority stated, “commercial realities” may require inclusion of different products or services in a single market, citing United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Leining v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
" Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
However, it limited the scope of the injunction to foreign nationals with a bona fide relationship to a person or entity in the United States. [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:29 am
American Express Financial Advisors, Inc., 6 N.Y.3d 242 (2006). [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:32 am
United States Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
CalPERS appealed, asserting that its individual suit was timely because the three-year time limit was subject to equitable tolling pursuant to American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm
United States Department of State et al. that software source could be protected under the American First Amendment, …the particular language one chooses change the nature of language for First Amendment purposes. [read post]
