Search for: "Apotex, Inc. " Results 101 - 120 of 674
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
 Canadian Supreme Court holds promise doctrine "unsound" in AstraZeneca v Apotex Nexium disputeThe AmeriKat Annsley provides a timely and in-depth analysis on the much-awaited decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Canada in the appeal between AstraZeneca Canada v Apotex (2017 SCC 36). [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:17 am by Howard Knopf
That satisfies a requirement that has been dealt with by Federal Court of Appeal in Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:17 am by Howard Knopf
That satisfies a requirement that has been dealt with by the Federal Court of Appeal in Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 11:12 am by John Duffy
On the last day of scheduled oral arguments in the term, the Affordable Care Act — the always controversial “Obamacare” statute — returns yet again to the Supreme Court, although many of the justices and their clerks will probably be wishing it weren’t so. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 9:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(collectively, Novartis).The Board instituted IPRs on all claims of the ’283 patentbased on petitions filed by Torrent PharmaceuticalsLimited, Apotex, Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 7:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Apotex, Inc. where the Federal Circuit affirmed that method claims for “once-daily dosing would likely survive an anticipation challenge by a prior advertisement that disclosed twice-daily dosing. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am by Dennis Crouch
Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 16-713 BPCIA – Notice of Commercial Marketing: Apotex Inc., et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Shell Oil Company, et al., No. 16-713 BPCIA – Notice of Commercial Marketing: Apotex Inc., et al. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:18 am by Gene Quinn
Mylan Pharmaceutical Inc. says they expect PTAB decisions on the IPRs sometime during the fourth quarter of 2017. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:20 am by Andre Hanson (US)
In the Order Amending Opinion, the Court explained that a new footnote is to be added to the decision, stating: Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:20 am by Andre Hanson (US)
In the Order Amending Opinion, the Court explained that a new footnote is to be added to the decision, stating: Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 9:17 pm by Patent Docs
Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
R. 50 JMOL motion) BPCIA – Notice of Commercial Marketing: Apotex Inc., et al. v. [read post]