Search for: "Apotex Corp. "
Results 101 - 120
of 333
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
See In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:55 am
Apotex Corp., --- F.3d. ---, 2015 WL 1529181 at *11 (Fed. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:00 am
NOVA Chemicals Corp 2014 FC 844 Justice O’Keefe found there was no explicit Promise for a specific result, such that a “mere scintilla” of utility was sufficient for Dows’ polymer patent. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 9:56 pm
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 9:59 pm
As set forth in the opinion, AstraZeneca's lawsuit against Apotex was part of the "second wave" of ANDA litigation, wherein the District Court apportioned into two sets of four defendants from the eight ANDA filers sued by AstraZeneca in the Southern District of New York starting at the end of the last century. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:49 am
Damages were at issue in this installment of the CAFC review of the omeprazole litigation:Apotex Corp., Apotex Inc., and TorPharm Inc., (collectively,“Apotex”) appeal from a final judgment enteredagainst them by the United States District Court for theSouthern District of New York. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 10:24 am
Microsoft Corp., 632 F.3d 1292 (Fed. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:23 pm
Mi-crosoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:59 pm
• Defendants: Apotex Inc.; Apotex Corp. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 9:06 pm
LLC; Aventis Pharma S.A.; Sanofi • Defendants: Apotex Corp.; Apotex Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 10:29 pm
Apotex, Inc., 550 F.3d 1075, 1082 (Fed.Cir. 2008). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH, on which Advocate General Melchior Wathelet has just delivered his opinion.* ECR-Award - BGH on the registrability of acronyms Birgit writes about a recently published decision by the German Federal Supreme Court concerning the registrability of acronyms as trade marks. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 9:48 am
The district court rejected defendants’ attempt to invoke the primary jurisdiction doctrine noting that there was no special expertise necessary to determine whether or not the FDA has approved a particular drug. [8] Id. at *9 [9] Id. [10] Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 1:35 am
Apotex Corp., 316 F.3d1348, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm
Apotex Inc. et al. 1:14-cv-01038; filed August 11, 2014 in the District Court of Delaware • Plaintiffs: Aptalis Pharmatech Inc.; Ivax International GmbH • Defendants: Apotex Inc.; Apotex Corp. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:09 pm
Target Corp., 556 F.3d 1310, 1328–29 (Fed. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 2:09 pm
Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:56 am
Procedural HistoryApotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:41 am
Apotex Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
., Apotex Corp., Sandoz, Inc., Hit-TechPharmacal Co., Inc., Actavis, Inc., Watson Laboratories,Inc., and Watson Pharma, Inc. [read post]
