Search for: "Appeal of General Tire, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 302
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm
The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently released its decision in the case ofIn re: Henry Riley v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
” The Supreme Court has just agreed to decide whether this exclusion of religious institutions from a generally available funding program violates the First Amendment (Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Appeals of district court decisions under this Rule are considered under the abuse-of-discretion standard. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
  The New York Court of Appeals is fine on the burden of proof in warning cases generally. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
   The court of appeals found the district court’s ruling accurate “while incorrect in its specific formulation. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 593 (1993) (specifying the “the known or potential rate of error” as one of several factors in assessing the scientific reliability or validity of proffered expert witness’s opinion) Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
Braun, 14-1123, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 5:36 am
Here are four recent appeals from Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusals. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
Access Senate Floor actions on S.1 - Keystone XL Pipeline Act(c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
The next step usually involves the California Supreme Court appointing habeas counsel, but Redd grew tired of waiting after two years and, acting pro se, asked the court to recall its order sending the case back to the trial court and take on his appeal again. [read post]