Search for: "Arthur Anderson" Results 101 - 120 of 284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm by Gary P. Rodrigues
Over 100 Titles To Be Published by 2015 A milestone is fast approaching for the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History.When the Society was founded in 1979, no one could have imagined that so extensive a collection of original research and writing on Canadian legal history would be the result. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 11:24 pm by Jarod Bona
Arthur Anderson LLP explained, for example, that “judges assessing the validity of restrictive covenants should determine only whether the covenant restrains a party’s ability to compete and, if so, whether one of the statutory exceptions to Section 16600 applies. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:02 am by Joy Waltemath
The court concluded that there is authority, Roquet v Arthur Anderson LLP, for the proposition that creatively shaping the timing of layoffs contravenes the purposes of the WARN Act. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
” Fans of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle will recognize that iterative disjunctive syllogism is nothing other than the process of elimination, as explained by Doyle’s fictional detective, Sherlock Holmes. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 1:35 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
" América del Norte Steve Anderson, Director Ejecutivo OpenMedia (Canadá - Internacional): "Estos 13 Principios representan una alternativa positiva a la vigilancia masiva clandestina e inexplicable. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:28 am by Katitza Rodriguez
" North America Steve Anderson, OpenMedia Executive Director (Canada - International): “These 13 Principles represent the positive alternative to secretive and unaccountable mass surveillance. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:05 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
  The court reasoned that if the whistleblower provisions only protected employees of publicly trades companies, then it would not protect employee of companies like Arthur Anderson who blow the whistle on fraud committed by a public traded company for which they work. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm by James Goodman
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008) and held that customer non-solicits were unenforceable, it noted that Edward’s agreement likewise contained an employee non-solicit, but since Edwards did not dispute that portion of the agreement or contend that it was unenforceable, it did not address the employee-non-solicit in its holding. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm by James (Jim) A. Goodman
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008) and held that customer non-solicits were unenforceable, it noted that Edward’s agreement likewise contained an employee non-solicit, but since Edwards did not dispute that portion of the agreement or contend that it was unenforceable, it did not address the employee-non-solicit in its holding. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:03 am by John Hopkins
It is actually surprising that we have not come all that far since the Arthur Anderson case, when the ABA held a conference with the description of one of the panels as: “Enron, Arthur Andersen, Sarbanes-Oxley, flash drives . . . all contribute to concern about what documents to create and retain. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
A decade later, I was at giant accounting firm KPMG during the demise of Enron and Arthur Anderson, and the subsequent re-regulation of the accounting industry in the wake of Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 3:01 am by Katitza Rodriguez
’” Steve Anderson, Executive Director, Openmedia.org, Canada:  "Dragnet surveillance is a threat to free expression, commerce, and our basic liberties. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 3:57 pm
  The discussants are Robert Grenier, Charles Blanchard, and me (with thanks to Bard’s Arthur Holland Michel for convening it). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Thomas Journal of Law & Public Policy 331-346 (2012).Arthur C. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:00 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Anderson Professor of Law and Values at University of Toledo College of Law Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) enacted a protective scheme for workers terminated for blowing the whistle on corporate and securities fraud. [read post]