Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability v." Results 101 - 120 of 551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2008, 11:16 am
Typically, MassTortDefense will post about significant opinions issued on product liability issues. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:37 pm by Asbestos Legal Center
  Capritti indicated that the claimants did not have a “cognizable and valid” claim despite each’s diagnosis of an asbestos disease AND exposure to Garlock asbestos products. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
Judge Eduardo Robreno recently ruled that punitive damages were available to seamen in the consolidated asbestos products liability multidistrict litigation pending in the Eastern District or Pennsylvania. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Robert Kreisman
A-C Product Liability Trust, 424 F.3d 488, 492 (6th 2005) stated that “plaintiff must show a high enough level of exposure that an inference that the asbestos was a substantial factor and the injury is more than conjectural. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by Kit Case
Bendix, which was subsumed by Honeywell in later years, continued to use asbestos in its brake- and clutch-pad products until 2001, LaVecchia said. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:27 am by Rebecca Davis, Olswang LLP
A case involving liability for alleged exposure to asbestos was recently heard by the Supreme Court, raising interesting issues as to the applicability of the Factories Act 1937 and Asbestos Industry Regulations 1931. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:02 am by Brett Burlison
Arvinmeritor Inc. and it’s an asbestos personal injury and product liability action in which the plaintiff was awarded 1.85 million in compensatory damages and $4.5 million in punitive damages. [read post]