Search for: "Associates Discount Corporation v. Held" Results 101 - 120 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
 Indeed, the Court of Appeals recognizes that “[v]aluing a closely held corporation is not an exact science” because such corporations “by their nature contradict the concept of a market’ value. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
 The panel will discuss the extent to which family ownership affects disputes in LLCs and other unincorporated entities; whether family businesses are distinctive in ways that are legally relevant; and whether, as a practical matter, the statutory differences between LLCs, corporations, and other forms of business association matter. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
A recent civil society assessment sums up the record to date: “All these efforts met with vigorous opposition from TNCs and their business associations, and they ultimately failed. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm by Tom McCarthy and Samuel B. Gedge
  The case has been a magnet for commentary, culminating with Justice Alito’s announcement that the Affordable Care Act cannot require certain closely held corporations to provide their employees with contraception coverage. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
” He stresses that the ruling is limited to closely held corporations, which are typically “mom-and-pop operations” that could face substantial liabilities if they were unable to use the corporate form. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Scott, 13-899, involves the discount store’s efforts to argue that under Wal Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
In its 1993 ruling in Nixon v Blackwell, the Delaware Supreme Court broadly rejected the notion that “there should be any special, judicially-created rules to ‘protect’ minority stockholders of closely-held Delaware corporations” (626 A.2d 1366, 1379). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
In what I believe will be called “Starbucks VI,” which constitutes the third appellate decision in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
   Schepers lived to 97, but his struggle was with his own past, not with alleged corporate crime. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Every fall, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and D&O insurance. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am by Ron Coleman
Textbook Discounters in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
Vitale, a trial court decision last year involving the buy-out of a minority shareholder in two closely held C corporations (read here my post on Giaimo); and Chiu v. [read post]