Search for: "B. Richardson" Results 101 - 120 of 644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am by Phil Dixon
This post summaries published criminal and related decisions decided by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in June, 2020 [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 9:16 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The CARES Act enabled any taxpayer with an RMD due in 2020 from a defined-contribution retirement plan, including a 401(k) or 403(b) plan, or an IRA, to skip those RMDs this year. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 4:26 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
HCSM Definition The proposed regulations draw their definition of a “health care sharing ministry” from section 5000A(d)(2)(B)(ii) of the Code, which provides that the individual shared responsibility payment (which is zero after December 31, 2018) does not apply to an individual who is a member of a health care sharing ministry. as an organization. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION In my post last week, I blogged the background to an analysis of constitutional challenges to interprovincial border closures. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm by Josh Blackman
Any other civil action or claim against the United States, not exceeding $10,000 in amount, founded either upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress, or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract with the United States, or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort, except that the district courts shall not have jurisdiction of any civil action or claim against the United States founded upon any express or implied contract… [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:33 am by Christopher Tyner
”  Finding itself bound by Richardson, the court determined that the trial court did not err in its instruction to the jury on self-defense. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:57 am by Giles Peaker
But the key takeaways from Wallace for our purposes are that a) what we are dealing with is loss of amenity, and b) there is no fixed attachment to the rent level. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:57 am by Giles Peaker
But the key takeaways from Wallace for our purposes are that a) what we are dealing with is loss of amenity, and b) there is no fixed attachment to the rent level. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:04 am by David Post
" This position is based on a rather egregious mis-reading of the leading Supreme Court case on the matter, Richardson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:33 am by John Rubin
Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays the School of Government from swift completion of their case summaries. [read post]