Search for: "Ball v. Public Service Commission"
Results 101 - 120
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm
In effect, the PCC is an outsourced customer services department. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
I have asked people that come to my blog, to post their stories for politicians, law makers and the general public to read and see the atrocities these laws are causing. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:57 am
The whistleblower provisions include the creation of a new whistleblower bounty pursuant to which individuals who bring violations of securities and commodities laws to the attention of the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission will receive between 10 percent and 30 percent of any recovery in excess of $1 million. ? [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Federal Election Commission. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am
Advertisers regularly use them to make a more memorable or effective claim about the product/service. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
Penguin Group v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:05 am
Seems to be stacked against bloggers for disclosure: there’s an assumption that the public doesn’t understand that a blogger might be getting some sort of product v. the New York Times book critic—assumption that public understands that the NYT writer gets the book for free, but not that the blogger does. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am
If ever there were justification for intrusive judicial review of constitutional provisions that protect “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Federal Election Commission. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:30 am
Recently, the Supreme Court acting in its legislative capacity voted on January 21, 2010 in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
Exhibit A is the language in the Commission’s August 20 [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 12:54 pm
The obvious advantages include sharing staff expertise and information, avoiding duplication of staff efforts, and facilitating public review by holding joint public meetings, issuing joint public notices, and producing a joint environmental document. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Anjani Kumar Goenka & Anr (IP Frontline) Hollywood v Bollywood v Tollywood: When is ‘plagiarism’ equal to ‘copyright infringement’? [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:39 am
Hempstead bay const/dsblLast Act: 03/11/09 referred to local governmentsA6713
Brennan (MS) -- Establishes a program and a fund to assist public service attorneys practicing criminal law to repay their student loans No Same asBLURB : St Fin. public serv attys assits Last Act: 03/11/09 referred to judiciaryS2176A
DIAZ -- Relates to clarifying definitions of "illegal money transmission" and "money laundering"; and relates to penalties for… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Litigation Blog) New Jersey local patent rules (IP Frontline) US Patents – Decisions CAFC applies KSR – finding combination claims obvious: Ball Aerosol v Limited Brands, Bath & Body Works etc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) CAFC rejects lower court’s ob [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pension December 10, 2008 Argument Transcript here SCOTUSWIKI here LIIBULLETIN here Noted here: Workforce Management; AARPGross v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper report… [read post]
