Search for: "Baum v. Baum"
Results 101 - 120
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
Schwartzman, Inc. v Pliskin, Rubano, Baum, & Vitulli, 215 A.D.3d 699 [2d Dept. 2023]; Park/ex Associates v Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP, 118 A.D.3d 698 [2d Dept.2014 ]). [read post]
9 May 2012, 11:09 am
Johnson & Johnson and Baum v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 8:14 pm
Goodson v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Glossip v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 6:52 am
Oshman v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:32 am
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 am
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:59 am
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:46 am
Johnson & Johnson, 593 F.3d 280 (3d Cir.2010), and Baum v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 pm
Baum, P.C. that brought an incredible 12,000 foreclosure lawsuits last year. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 8:31 am
Baum Boulevard Investors, LP, No. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Baum, of Staten Island, NY, represented the husband. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:10 pm
Casey, refusing to overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 3:25 am
Schwake, 967 F.3d at 948; Baum, 903 F.3d at 586; Doe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am
Logalbo v Plishkin, Rubano & Baum, 163 AD2d 511, 514). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:55 am
Bells v Foster 2011 NY Slip Op 03195 Decided on April 19, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department say: "Here, the plaintiff failed to establish her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law because she failed to demonstrate that any negligence on the defendant's part in failing to timely cancel the contract of sale on her behalf was the sole proximate cause of her damages (see Snolis v Clare, 81 AD3d… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
They failed to demonstrate that the appellants' alleged malpractice (the failure to tender written notice of cancellation of the contract of sale) was a proximate cause of their damages (see Bells v Foster, 83 AD3d 876, 877; compare Logalbo v Plishkin, Rubano & Baum, 163 AD2d 511). [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Finally, in Baum Family Trust v. [read post]
