Search for: "Berger v. Berger" Results 101 - 120 of 800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Ofman v Tenenbaum Berger & Shivers LLP  2020 NY Slip Op 32828(U)  July 23, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County  Docket Number: 524482/2019  Judge: Richard Velasquez,  Plaintiff alleged that had the attorney been quicker, the defendant would not have been able to leave the US and the judgment would have been collectible. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 7:50 pm by Schachtman
Berger, “The Admissibility of Expert Testimony,” in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 11, 20 & n.51 (3d ed. 2011) (posthumously citing Milward v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 12:42 pm by Jeff Gamso
 It was written by Justice Sutherland in Berger v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Berger v Lewis Johs Avallone Aviles, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 05952 Decided on November 27, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department makes the point that it is not necessary to specifically allege that the alleged malpractice “fell within the agreed scope of defendant’s representation”, although it is necessary that the actual scope of representation encompasses the claimed negligent act. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Today, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued this order in Miller v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:08 pm
Berger Held: When stating a claim for breach of fiduciary duty by the board of directors in a stock-for-stock merger, the duty of profit maximization under Shenker v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Berger v Rokeach  2017 NY Slip Op 27374  Decided on November 20, 2017  Supreme Court, Kings County  Silber, J. answers these questions with a strong degree of specificity. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 11:36 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Berger Seyfarth Synopsis: A district court judge within the Second Circuit held that, in light of Cheeks v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Northrop v Thorsen, 46 AD3d 780, 783; Johnson v Berger, 193 AD2d 784, 786; Sucese v Kirsch, 177 AD2d 890, 892), that argument is without merit. [read post]