Search for: "Best v. Social Security Administration"
Results 101 - 120
of 913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
In a recent case, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3134 : August 30, 2011 Judge: Shepherd Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Appellee applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1382. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3134 : August 30, 2011 Judge: Shepherd Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Appellee applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1382. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
The justifications for these EOs remain murky at best. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 11:55 am
The Federal law authorizes each state to enact legislation permitting employers and their workers’ compensation insurance companies (“E/C”), rather than the Social Security Administration, to take the offset. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
Social Security Administration. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
See, e.g., Social Security Bd. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 8:15 am
Hiring an attorney places you in the best position for success with your Social Security Disability case. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 12:40 pm
CISA is part of the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Access to recorded classes will be controlled via a secure course management platform, such as ANGEL, and will be restricted to students enrolled in the recorded course, the professor, and those University IIT personnel necessary to maintain the system. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:02 pm
The Salomaa court concluded: The administrator’s procedural violations are similar to those in Saffon v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am
How best to create incentives? [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
“If we make America the best place to do business, businesses should make their mark in America. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:22 pm
For if [Social Security Board v.] [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:56 pm
Today, it's FCC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
When the Social Security Administration stopped making Supplemental Security Income payments to 5-year-old Brian Zebley, despite his continuing and severe disabilities, lawyers at the legal aid organization Community Legal Services filed a class action. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 3:39 pm
An alien number is similar to an immigrant’s social security number. [read post]
