Search for: "Board of Education v. A, C & S, INC." Results 101 - 120 of 422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows:  Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 01564 (1st Dept., 2020) the Appellate Division held that Family Court properly denied respondent’s request for a credit for the child’s college room and board expenses. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 10:57 am by Jon L. Gelman
Oakland Board of Education, C-234 Sept.Term 2019, 2019 WL 5847242, Petition for Certification Granted NOVEMBER 4, 2019 Read more » A-23-19 Mary Richter v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by William B. Gould IV
Board of Education,(2) notwithstanding the continued segregation of so much education today, did make a mighty contribution toward a different understanding of and attitude toward race, expanded upon by the civil rights comprehensive legislation of the 60’s, set back somewhat in these past couple of years since 2017. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
This was first made clear in Justice Brennan's opinion in Speiser v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
The next day, Rose cooked the pig just the way she was told to by Stewart’s. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Here is the provision:Fair and equitable66.501 The Board shall fix royalty and levy rates and any related terms and conditions under this Act that are fair and equitable, in consideration of(a) what would have been agreed upon between a willing buyer and a willing seller acting in a competitive market with all relevant information, at arm’s length and free of external constraints;(b) the public interest;(c) any regulation made under subsection… [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Monday’s opinion in Gamble v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 12:21 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Summary Plan Description states that it does not constitute a part of the insurance plan or part of the insurance policy.The plaintiff acknowledges that ERISA is not applicable to the subject Sun Life plan as it constitutes a governmental plan exempt from ERISA (see 29 USC §§ 1002[32]; 1003[b][1]; Lyndaker v Board of Educ. of W. [read post]