Search for: "Boston Scientific Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2015, 6:31 am
CanadaPriest that abused Inuit children to address court, Canadian PressB.C. dog walker to be sentenced for killing dogs, Canadian PressMan wins lawsuit against TD Bank after institution declared him deceased, The National PostUnited StatesJohnson & Johnson dispute against Boston Scientific Corp. in hands of federal judge, ReutersS&P to pay settlement with regulators over allegations of misleading investors, ReutersInternationalTrial for Islamic State fighter… [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Court Denies Plaintiff’s Fallback Request for Meet and Confer after Quashing its Subpoena: In Boston Scientific Corporation v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:42 am by admin
Other manufacturers of transvaginal mesh devices known to cause severe complications include Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corp. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
We at the DDLaw blog wish all our readers a Happy New Year as 2014 recedes inexorably into our rear-view mirror. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 7:56 am by Dean Freeman
In the first federal lawsuit against Boston Scientific Corp. over its defective vaginal mesh product, the company has been ordered by jurors in a Miami federal court to pay nearly $27 million to four Florida women who say they were injured by the medical devices. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:13 pm by Lisa Baird
Boston Scientific Corp., a case filed in the Southern District of West Virginia. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 10:00 pm by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Boston Scientific Corp., the Federal Circuit held that it has jurisdiction over the parties’ patent-related contract dispute under Gunn v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:29 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
According to confidential sources, other manufacturers including Boston Scientific Corp., Bard, and Coloplast A/S are engaged in settlement talks. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:13 pm by Schachtman
While we might excuse the Court of Appeals’ missteps in interpreting scientific evidence, even if filtered through funnels created by the plaintiffs’ expert witness Zimmet and the law firm of Peters & Peters, harder to forgive is the Court’s bobbling the interpretation of apportionment in New Jersey courts. [read post]